ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ISTEKAR @ ISTEKHAR @ TULLI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13220 of 2022
Applicant :- Istekar @ Istekhar @ Tulli
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Bhavya Sahai,Sr. Advocate
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard Sri Brijesh Sahai, learned Senior Advocate assisted by
Sri Bhavya Sahai, learned counsel for the applicant, learned
A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record. No one has
appeared on behalf of the informant, despite service of notice.
The present second bail application has been filed by the
applicant in Case Crime No. 598 of 2020, under Sections 376,
34 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kithore,
District Meerut with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The first bail application of applicant was rejected by this Court
on merits, vide order dated 21.06.2021.
It has been argued by learned Senior counsel that applicant is
innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It was
stated that during her medical examination, victim girl has
clearly stated that no rape was committed upon her. It was
submitted that the allegations of victim girl regarding rap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.