SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 24313

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ISTEKAR @ ISTEKHAR @ TULLI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 88

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13220 of 2022

Applicant :- Istekar @ Istekhar @ Tulli

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Bhavya Sahai,Sr. Advocate

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

Heard Sri Brijesh Sahai, learned Senior Advocate assisted by

Sri Bhavya Sahai, learned counsel for the applicant, learned

A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record. No one has

appeared on behalf of the informant, despite service of notice.

The present second bail application has been filed by the

applicant in Case Crime No. 598 of 2020, under Sections 376,

34 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kithore,

District Meerut with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.

The first bail application of applicant was rejected by this Court

on merits, vide order dated 21.06.2021.

It has been argued by learned Senior counsel that applicant is

innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It was

stated that during her medical examination, victim girl has

clearly stated that no rape was committed upon her. It was

submitted that the allegations of victim girl regarding rap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top