2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 29077
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
SMT MOBEEN JAHAN – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
WRIC/30281/2022
The Tehsildar has no authority to cancel a caste certificate and should refer the matter to the State Level Caste Scrutinizing Committee.
Headnote:
CASTE CERTIFICATE - CANCELLATION - AUTHORITY
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's caste certificate was canceled by the Tehsildar without referring the matter to the State Level Caste Scrutinizing Committee.
Finding of the Court:
The Tehsildar has no authority to cancel a caste certificate and should have referred the matter to the State Level Caste Scrutinizing Committee.
Issues: Whether the Tehsildar has the authority to cancel a caste certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil and another Vs. Addl. Commissioner, Tribunal Development and others, reported in (1994) 6 SCC, 241, which held that the Tehsildar has no authority to cancel a caste certificate.
Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned order dated 07.09.2022 canceling the caste certificate of the petitioner and remitted the matter back to the respondent no.2 to ensure that District Level Scrutiny Committee shall consider the matter and pass an order in accordance with law within a period of two months from today, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30281 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt Mobeen Jahan
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Ashutosh
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel.
On 09.11.2022, this Court had passed the following order:
"Argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as
per the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Kumari
Madhuri Patil and another Vs. Addl. Commissioner,
Tribunal Development and others, reported in (1994) 6
SCC, 241 the Tehsildar has no authority to cancel the caste
certificate.
If at all the Tehsildar desired cancellation of a caste
certificate he ought to have refered the matter to the State
Level Caste Scrutinizing Committee, which was not done in
the present case.
Learned Standing Counsel may seek instructions in the
matter.
List this case on 18.11.2022 as fresh.
Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the
petitioner."
Today, learned standing counsel states on instructions of the District
Magistrate, Rampur dated 17.11.2022 that the impugned order dated
07.09.2022 was wrongly passed by the Tehsildar cancelling the caste
certificate of the petitioner, whereas, a District Level Scrutiny
Committee for caste certificate has been constituted and report has
been sought from the S.D.M. (Sadar), Rampur. He submits that the
District Level Scrutiny Committee shall pass appropriate order in
accordance with law within a time bound period.
In view of the submission made by learned standing counsel, as
aforenoted, the impugned order dated 07.09.2022 cancelling the caste
certificate of the petitioner is hereby quashed and matter is remitted
back to the respondent no.2 to ensure that District Level Scrutiny
Committee shall consider the matter and pass an order in accordance
with law within a period of two months from today, after affording
reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of
the case of the petitioner.
With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.
This order shall be communicated by the learned standing counsel to
the respondent no.2 within three days for compliance.
Order Date :- 4.1.2023
Ankit.
Digitally signed by :-
ANKIT VISHWAKARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad