SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUDHEER KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 66

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37461 of 2022

Applicant :- Sudheer Kumar And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Madan Ji Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.

Heard Mr. Madan Ji Pandey the learned counsel for applicants

and the learned A.G.A. for State.

Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to the

order dated 16.11.2019 passed by Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate-I, Ballia in Complaint Case No.1235 of 2018

(Pushpa Dev vs. Reena Devi and others), whereby the discharge

application filed by the applicants in terms of Section 245

Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

At the very out set, learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary

objection regarding maintainability of present application under

Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Learned A.G.A. submits that the present application has been

filed after expiry of a period of more than three years from the

date of the impugned order dated 16.11.2019.As such present

application is hopelessly barred by latches. Moreover the

latches in filing the present application have not been

sufficiently explained. As the latches in filing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top