SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMESHWAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 40

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 114 of 2023

Appellant :- Rameshwar

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Appellant :- Shikher Trivedi,Durvesh Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation

Application No. 1 of 2023.

The delay in filing the appeal has been explained in

the affidavit.

Cause shown is found sufficient.

Delay is condoned.

Application is allowed.

Order on Appeal.

1. Heard Shri Shikher Trivedi, learned counsel for the

appellant, Shri Mohan Srivastava, learned Standing

Counsel for the State respondents.

2. The Special Appeal is questioning the validity of

the impugned judgment and order dated 05.08.2022

passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ

Petition No. 11467 of 2022 (Rameshwar versus State

of U.P. and others) and further prayed that the

respondent be directed to accept the claim of the

petitioner for appointment in the O.B.C. category in

accordance with law during the pendency of this

Special Appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of his

submission states that while passing the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top