ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VISHAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/29424/2022
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29424 of 2022
Applicant :- Vishal
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Upadhyay
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and
perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime
No. 0276 of 2022, under sections 419, 420 I.P.C. and section 60(1) Excise
Act, P.S. Jagdishpura, district-Agra, is seeking enlargement on bail during
the trial.
As per prosecution case, on the tip off of 'mukhbir khas', a team of Excise
Department along with local police arrested the present accused and
recovered 6 bottles of Aromatic Cardamom Tincture from his possession.
It was also alleged that 121 bottles of Aromatic Cardamom Tincture were
also recovered from Krishna Medical Store near Bodla crossing, Agra.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not
committed any offence but the Excise Department only to increase the
gravity of offence implicated the applicant in the present case. He next
submits that whether the Aromatic Cardamom Tincture is a kind of liquor
or medicine and in this regard he moved an application through RTI and in
reply to RTI application, the Assistant Commissioner (Drugs), Agra Zone,
Agra stated that inspection of an authorized license holder medical store
can be done only by a Drugs Inspector, except him no one can inspect the
license of the Medical shop. He also submits that the offences are triable
by court of Magistrate. He lastly submits that the applicant has no
criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 11.5.2022 and in case
he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will
cooperate in trial.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the
accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of learned counsel for
the parties, considering the law laid down in the case of Data Ram Vs.
State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 and without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the
applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.
Let the applicant, Vishal involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail
on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the
like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the
following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending
before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the
sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at
liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 17.8.2022
Faridul
Digitally signed by FAREEDUL
HASAN
Date: 2022.08.23 17:24:13 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.