ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PATTU – Appellant
Versus
B R – Respondent
Court No. 52
WRIT – B No. - 5418 of 1980
Petitioner :-
Pattu
Respondent :-
Board of Revenue, U.P., Allahabad
and Others
Counsel for Petitioner:-
R.C. Singh, Senior Advocate, N.D.
Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Shashi Prakash Mishra
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1.
Heard Sri R.C. Singh, the learned Senior Counsel
assisted by Sri N.D. Shukla, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri Shashi Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for
respondent no.2.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that petitioner filed a suit under
Section 229-B/209 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act with the
allegations that he was co-tenant along with the defendants of
the plot in dispute, situated in village Thanwa Mundiari and in
village Deorar. Petitioner’s father Ramdin died just before the
consolidation operation, leaving behind the plaintiff-petitioner as
his heir and legal representative. During consolidation
operation, dispute arose in respect of the plots in dispute,
situated in village Deorar and the Deputy Director of
Consolidation has finally held that plaintiff-petitioner is son of
Ramdin, the judgment of Deputy Direc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.