SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. ROSHANI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIKAS SRIVASTAVA', '', 'DAN BAHADUR', 'G A', '', 'SHIV PRAKASH']

Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17125 of 2022

Applicant :- Smt. Roshani

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Srivastava,Dan Bahadur

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shiv Prakash

AND

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49423 of 2022

Applicant :- Pradeep

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Srivastava,Dan Bahadur

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the complainant as

well as learned A.G.A.

Both the accused persons are husband and wife and are facing prosecution

arising out of case crime no.419 of 2021 under sections 364, 302, 201, 394, 411

IPC, police station-Bilari, District-Moradabad and are behind the bars since

02.11.2021.

Pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and the matter is ripe for

final submissions.

As per the prosecution case mentioned in the FIR, on 20.09.2021, the FIR was

got registered 364, 302, 201 IPC by Smt. Mitthan against unknown persons with

the allegation that his husband Sooraj was e-rickshaw driver. On 19.09.2021,

when he did not reach to the house till late night, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top