2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 25779
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DARBARI LAL YADAV AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
WRIA/10422/2022
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10422 of 2022
Petitioner :- Darbari Lal Yadav And 2 Others
Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sankalp Narain,Srivats Narain
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Heard Mr. Srivats Narain, learned counsel for the
petitioners, learned State Counsel for respondents 1 and
2. Notices to respondents 3 and 4 stand dispensed with.
Petition has been filed seeking direction to respondents to
release monthly salary along with arrears and interest
with effect from December, 2019. A further prayer
commanding the District Inspector of Schools to forthwith
enforce his order dated 24.02.2022 directing the
management to release salary of petitioners has also
been sought.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the institution
namely Sri Krishna Inter College, Nawabganj, Bareilly is a
recognized unaided Intermediate College where the
petitioners were appointed as part-time Assistant
Teachers(L.T Grade) with the same being approved by
the District Inspector of Schools vide order dated
07.02.1989. They were subsequently promoted and and
have been paid their salary through out till December,
2019 when it was inexplicably stopped.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although the
institution in question is unaided but a writ petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India would be
maintainable as has been held in the Full Bench decision
of this Court in Aley Ahmad Abdi v. District Inspector of
Schools and others, reported in 1976 AWC 731.
It is submitted that since the petitioners have been
appointed in terms of Section 7 AA(3) of U.P.
Intermediate Education Act, 1921(hereinafter referred to
as the Act of 1921) in terms of Government Order dated
10.08.2001, the petition as such is maintainable.
It has been further submitted that for the aforesaid
grievance petitioners have already submitted a
representation dated 12.10.2021 in pursuance of which
the Inspector has issued letter dated 24.02.2022 requiring
the Management to pay salary along with arrears to
petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions as well
as material on record, it is evident that although the
institution concerned is unaided but in terms of the
aforesaid Full Bench decision in
Aley Ahmad
Abdi(supra), the petition would be maintainable
particularly for the enforcement of performance of legal
obligations and duties. Since petitioners' appointment
have been made in pursuance to provisions of the Act of
1921 as indicated herein above and the Government
Order dated 10.08.2001, it is held that the petition is
maintainable.
Further more, it is also a relevant factor that upon
representation being made by petitioners, the District
Inspector of Schools Bareilly has conducted some enquiry
whereafter he issued directions to the the College
Management vide letter dated 24.02.2022 requiring the
Management to make payment of salary along with
arrears. The said directions appear to be uncomplied with
till date.
Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions as well
as the material on record, respondents 3 and 4 are
directed to make payment of salary to petitioners along
with arrears with effect from December, 2019 in terms of
statutory provisions and Government Orders indicated
herein above within a period of two months from the date
a copy of this order is produced before the said
respondents. In case of any legal impediment, petitioners
shall be made aware of the same within the same time
period.
With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is
finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 2.8.2022
kvg/-
Digitally signed by GIREESAN KV
Date: 2022.08.04 20:02:44 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature
at Allahabad