ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
SUNIL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41158
of 2021
Applicant :- Sunil
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Bhartendu Pathak,Ajay Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and
learned A.G.A. for the State through video conferencing and
perused the material placed on record.
Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 8 of 2021 U/S 406, 419,
420, 120B IPC and 66(D) Information & Technology Act,
Police Station Syber Crime, District Agra, during the pendency
of trial.
As per the prosecution story, Ankita Mishra has called the first
informant and stated that LIC amount of Rs. 7,51,540/- has
been refunded and if the first informant wants the money, he
could contact the co-accused Pramod Tiwari. Pramod Tiwari is
said to have directed the first informant to one Prem Chand
Kothari on whose direction, the first informant is said to have
deposited Rs. 3,11,500/- through N.E.F.T. in the accounts
referred by the co-accused persons.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is not named in the FIR and the similarly placed co-
acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.