SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 25883

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRAKASH PADIA
SURYABHAN – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
WPIL/312/2022



Court No. - 19

Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 312 of

2022

Petitioner :- Suryabhan

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Kumar,Ram Krishna

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai,Jagat Narayan

Mishra

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Rejoinder affidavit in response to the counter affidavit filed by

the respondent nos. 4 and 5, has been filed today in the Court,

the same is taken on record.

The petitioner has preferred the present public interest litigation

with the following prayer:-

"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to

commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to restore plot nos. 686,699,697

to 1204 as "Talab", "Jheel" and "Chak Marg" on the spot in village Rara,

Pargana, Tehsil and District Fatehpur.

b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding

the respondent no. 2 and 3 to correct the village map of village Rara,

Pargana, Tehsil and District Fatehpur."

Today when the matter is taken up, it is very fairly argued by

the counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought by the

petitioner in the present public interest litigation has already

been granted, matter is resolved and encroachment has already

been removed, hence the petitioner does not want to press the

present petition.

Accordingly the present petition is dismissed as having become

infructuous.

Order Date :- 16.8.2022

Swati

Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK

Date: 2022.08.18 15:33:53 IST

Reason:

Location: High Court of Judicature

at Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top