ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18007
of 2022
Applicant :- Sachin
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anupam Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the
State and perused the material placed on record.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that it is
admitted by the complainant that applicant has given
information about the said incident. It is case of snake bite,
which may also be verified from the postmortem report. As per
post mortem report, injury is punctured wound of size 0.1x0.2
cm on forehead at 4 cm above left eyebrow surrounded by
0.2x0.2 cm colour deceleration and swelling to it. In fact, this
injury is due to snake bite. The cause of death could not be
ascertained, therefore, viscera was preserved and sent for
chemical analysis to Forensic Science Laboratory, Ghaziabad,
but till date report has not been obtained. It is lastly contended
that the applicant is having no crimina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.