Advocates:
['PIYUSH DUBEY', '', 'G A', '', 'POOJA SAXENA INPERSON']

1

A.F.R.

Reserved on: 15.03.2022

Delivered on: 13.04.2022

Court No. - 88

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29682 of 2017

Applicant :- Vivek Mathura

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Dubey,

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pooja Saxena (In person)

and

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36696 of 2017

Applicant :- U.C. Mathur And Another

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Dubey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.

1.

Since both the applications arise out of the same proceedings, they

are being decided by this common order.

2.

Heard Sri Piyush Dubey, learned counsel for the applicants, Smt.

Pooja Saxena, opposite party no.2 appearing in person as well as Sri

L.D. Rajbhar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3.

The present applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been

moved seeking quashing of the proceeding of Complaint Case No. 203

of 2017 (Smt. Pooja Saxena vs Vivek Mathur and others), under Section

406 I.P.C., Police Station- Hari Parwat, District- Agra, pending in the

court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5 as well as

summoning order da