SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 31036

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJ VEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJ KUMAR KHANNA', '', 'MOHD IMRAN KHAN', 'BHARAT SINGH', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']

AFR

Court No. - 49

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3781 of 2002

Appellant :- Raj Veer

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Raj Kumar Khanna,Bharat

Singh,Mohd Imran Khan

Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate

Bench: Hon’ble Suneet Kumar & Hon’ble Vikram D. Chauhan,JJ.

Suneet Kumar,J.

1.

Heard Sri Bharat Singh, learned counsel for the

appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the lower

court record with the assistance of learned counsels.

2.

This criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment

and order dated 6.9.2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge

IV, Moradabad in S.T. No.184 of 2002 (State Vs. Rajveer),

under sections 452 and 376 IPC, P.S. Hayat Nagar, District

Moradabad, whereby, the appellant has been convicted and

sentenced under section 452 IPC with one year rigorous

imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- and convicted and

sentenced under Section 376 IPC with life imprisonment and

fine of Rs.10,000/-. In case of default in payment of fine,

additional simple imprisonment for a period of two years.

3.

As per prosecution case, husband of the victim i.e.

Sukhram lodged a report on 31.3.2001 at 12:10 p.m. alleging

that on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top