SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 16943

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
YOGENDRA KUMAR JAIN @ Y.K. JAIN – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['KUMAR SRESHTHA', '', 'Sr Advocate', 'G A']

Court No. - 73

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL

APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17761 of 2021

Applicant :- Yogendra Kumar Jain @ Y.K. Jain

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Sreshtha,Sr. Advocate

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for

the State and perused the record.

2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory

bail in Case Crime no. 0121 of 2021, under Sections 409, 420

and 120-B IPC, P.S. Fazalganj, District Kanpur Nagar (South

Commissionerate), with the prayer that in the event of arrest,

applicant may be released on bail.

3. According to the prosecution, in JNNURM scheme of

Government, PAC pipes of 2100 mm were to be laid under

'Kanpur Punargathan Payjal Plan Phase Ist', Kanpur and the

applicant was working as Superintendent Engineer. During

inquiry, it was found that the terms and conditions of the

contract with supplier of pipes were changed without approval

of the competent authority and that sub-standard GRP pipes

were used in place of PAC pipes. Terms and conditions

regarding payment to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top