SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PHOOLCHAND AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 9

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12848 of 2022

Petitioner :- Phoolchand And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Tiwari

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Kumar Dave

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

1. Heard Shri Rakesh Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the

petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4

and Shri Alok Kumar Dave, learned counsel for respondent

no.6.

2. The petitioners have preferred present writ petition inter-alia

with the prayer to quash the impugned orders dated 28.09.2018

and 02.12.2021 passed by the respondent no.2-Additional

Commissioner (Judicial-IInd), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj

and 4-Tehsildar Phoolpur, District Prayagraj respectively. By

the aforesaid orders application filed by the petitioners for

mutation under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act was

rejected.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and from

perusal of the record, it appears that petitioners had contested

the mutation proceedings filed under Section 34 of the U.P.

Land Revenue Act till the stage of revision. It had been a

constant view of this Court as well as the Apex Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top