ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT
SMT.KARUNESH KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA NARAYAN MISHRA – Respondent
A227/7931/2021
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a recall application under Order 9 rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for recalling the order dated 24.12.1994. The recall application dated 17/18.08.2015 was time-barred, hence, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was also filed. The case was registered as Misc. Case No. 52 of 2015.
Finding of the Court:
The Civil Judge (Junior Division) Etawah is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously and if possible, within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, unless there is any legal impediment.
Issues: Delay in deciding the Misc. Case No. 52 of 2015 (Surendra Narayan Mishra vs. Smt. Karunesh Kumari) since 2015 due to delaying tactics adopted by the respondents.
Final Decision: The instant petition is finally disposed of.
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7931 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt.Karunesh Kumari
Respondent :- Surendra Narayan Mishra
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner
and perused the record.
Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Etawah to decide the Misc. Case
No. 52 of 2015 (Surendra Narayan Mishra vs. Smt. Karunesh
Kumari & others) within stipulated period of time.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the
petitioner has filed recall application under Order 9 rule 13 read
with Section 151 C.P.C. for recalling the order dated
24.12.1994. It is submitted that the recall application dated
17/18.08.2015 was time barred, hence, application under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act has also been filed. The case
was registered as Misc. Case No. 52 of 2015. It is further
submitted that the Misc. Case No. 52 of 2015 (Surendra
Narayan Mishra vs. Smt. Karunesh Kumari) could not be
proceed and is pending for disposal since 2015 and on account
of delaying tactics adopted by the respondents, it could not be
decided till date and only prayer is to direct the Court
concerned for expeditious disposal of the same.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner and without going into merit of the case, the Civil
Judge (Junior Division) Etawah is directed to decide the
aforesaid case expeditiously and if possible, within a period of
one year from the date of production of certified copy of this
order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either
of the parties, unless there is any legal impediment.
With the aforesaid direction, the instant petition is finally
disposed of.
Order Date :- 5.1.2022
sailesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.