SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SMT. MANU KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS – Respondent


AFR

Court No. - 40

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25042 of 2011

Petitioner :- Smt. Manu Kumari

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Sahai

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.

Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.

1.

Today when the matter was taken up a request was made on behalf of

the Sri Rahul Sahai, learned counsel for the petitioner for adjourning the

matter. However, this Court finds that present petition is of the year 2011 and

the petitioner has not been able to obtain any interim order.

2.

Accordingly, present writ petition is being decided on the basis of

pleadings so available on record and after hearing Sri Sharad Srivastava,

learned Standing Counsel.

3.

This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

following reliefs:-

"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the

impugned order dated 4.4.2011 passed by the respondent no. 4 vide Patrank No.

4126/22-18 (Annexure-1 to the Writ Petition).

2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and

directing the respondent authorities not to interfere in the peaceful running and

functioning of the Saw Mill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top