ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AFSAROON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY HOME AT LUCKNOW – Respondent
BAIL/55942/2021
BAIL - 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC - Bail granted considering the nature of the offence, evidence on record, larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC. He was granted bail by the trial court but absconded. He was later arrested and has been in jail since 23.9.2021.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had made out a case for bail. The court considered the nature of the offence, the evidence on record, the larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and the dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant had made out a case for bail. The court considered the nature of the offence, the evidence on record, the larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and the dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55942
of 2021
Applicant :- Afsaroon
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At
Lucknow
Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for
the State through video conferencing and perused the material
placed on record.
Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 14 of 2007 U/S 147,
148, 149, 307 IPC, Police Station Shahpur, District Muzaffar
Nagar, during the pendency of trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant
is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the
present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and
to victimize him. He has further stated that the applicant was on
bail in the present case but due to his abscondance, an NBW
was issued against him vide order dated 16.1.2019 and the
applicant is attending the Court on warrant from jail since
23.9.2021. It is further stated that the applicant has not
deliberately disobeyed the order of the Court and he shall
certainly abide with the order. The applicant is languishing in
jail since 23.9.2021. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he
will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence on record
regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the
Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex
Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and
another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing
any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view
that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail
application is allowed.
Let the applicant- Afsaroon, who is involved in aforementioned
case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond
and two heavy local sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following
conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties
be verified.
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he
shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence
when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of
this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as
abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on
each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case
of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may
proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial
and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section
82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before
the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial
Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with
law, under Section 174-A IPC.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the
Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2)
framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section
313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the
applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall
be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of
liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a
ground for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the
applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in
forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the
witnesses.
Order Date :- 12.1.2022
Shalini
Digitally signed by KRISHAN PAHAL
Date: 2022.01.13 19:15:59 IST
Reason: Document Owner
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.