SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRADYUMN PANDEY @ MANISH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['IRSHAD AHMAD', '', 'AJAY KUMAR PANDEY', 'MATIUR REHMAN KHAN', 'G A', '', 'AMAR NATH TIWARI']

Court No. - 77

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12270

of 2022

Applicant :- Pradyumn Pandey @ Manish Pandey

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad,Ajay Kumar

Pandey,Matiur Rehman Khan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amar Nath Tiwari

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

A supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the

applicant is taken on record.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the

first informant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the

record.

The accused- applicant is involved in Case Crime No.02 of

2022, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 147, 328, 386,

368, 302, 201, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Bariyarpur, District-

Deoria.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that as

per the FIR Arun Kumar Kumar is said to have kidnapped the

complainant and after administering him noxious tablets and by

putting him under threat and pressure, without paying any

consideration got a sale deed executed and the present applicant

is said to have helped him as a tout. The Investigating Officer

found no role of the applicant in the offence and thereafter

moved an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top