ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJIT KUMAR
SANTOSH KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
ENTRANCE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD – Respondent
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3062 of 2022
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumari
Respondent :- Entrance Examination Controller, University Of Allahabad
Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person
Counsel for Respondent :- Kshitij Shailendra
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Ms. Santosh Kumari, petitioner in person and Sri
Subham Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has
prayed for reevaluation of her OMR Sheet.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that earlier
also petitioner had filed writ petition with same prayer and
that writ petition had been dismissed on merits vide order
dated 25th January, 2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 34522
of 2021. In that writ petition, this Court had categorically
recorded a finding to the effect that no specific allegations
were raised in the petition that might give rise to the
ground that her answersheet was not correctly evaluated.
In my considered view, second writ petition with similar
prayer is certainly barred under Rule 7 of Chapter XXII of
the Rules of the Court, 1952.
This petition is accordingly dismissed and consigned to
records.
Order Date :- 25.2.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.