2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 21157
LAKHPAT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
A482 9763/2022
['SURESH CHANDRA KUSHWAHA', '', 'PUSPHA SINGH', 'GURU PRASAD SINGH', 'G A']
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9763 of 2022
Applicant :- Lakhpat Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Kushwaha,Guru
Prasad Singh,Puspha Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1-Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for
the State and perused the record.
2-This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been 昀椀led
by the applicant to quash/set aside the summoning order
dated 27.08.2021 as well as bailable warrant dated
24.03.2022
issued
by
the
learned
Judicial
Magistrate/Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Khurja, District
Bulandshahr in complaint case no. 162 of 2021, under
Section 138 of N.I. (Negotiable Instrument) Act, Police
Station Chhatari, District Bulandshahr.
3-Leaned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the
applicant is ready to resolve the dispute amicably with
Respondent No.2 and prays that opportunity may be given
to the applicant for the same.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has also placed
reliance upon judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of
Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., 2010 (5)
SCC 663 and M/s Meters and Instruments Private
Limited and another vs. Kanchan Mehta, 2018(1)
SCC 560 and further submitted that the Apex Court in the
aforesaid cases has taken cognizance of the heavy
pendency of the cases in the courts which may result
ultimately in the chocking of criminal justice system. It has
been urged that with the laudable object of providing the
rival parties, who have hitherto locked their horns in
litigation, an opportunity to arrive at a mutually agreeable
settlement and put to an end to the escalating litigations,
the compounding of the o昀昀ence has not only been
encouraged but in order to given incentive to do so at the
earliest stage, certain guidelines have also been issued by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has also placed
reliance upon the order of this Court dated 10.03.2022
passed in Application U/s 482 No.5469 of 2022, wherein
the liberty has been given to the applicant to move bail
application through counsel and the court concerned shall
pass order in the light of judgement of the Apex Court in
the cases of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra) and M/s
Meters and Instruments Private Limited and another
(supra). This Court has also directed that till the decision
given, no coercive measures shall be adopted against the
applicants, so the present application may be decided in
the light of order 10.03.2022 passed in Application U/s 482
No.5469 of 2022.
6. Leaned A.G.A. has not disputed the prayer made by
learned counsel for the applicants.
7-As requested by the learned counsel for the applicant, it
is directed that the accused may appear before the Court
below within a period of one month from today through the
representing counsel and move an application seeking
compounding of o昀昀ence through compromise. On such
application being moved, the concerned Court may take
adequate steps in accordance with law in this regard and
shall provide opportunity to the accused and the
complainant which shall not exceed a maximum period of
three months from today to make an endeavour in this
direction. Thereafter, the Court shall pass necessary orders
speci昀椀cally keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex
Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra) as also
the latest amendment made in the N.I. Act within a period
of four months from today. If the decision of the Court
given in the light of the application does not conclude the
proceedings against the accused in that event accused will
be required to appear and face the trial, the Court shall be
at liberty to proceed in accordance with law against the
accused and take all necessary steps and measures to
procure his attendance as the law permits
8-In