SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RITAMBHARA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 36

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13031 of 2022

Petitioner :- Ritambhara

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishabh Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

Heard Sri Archit Mandhyan alongwith Sri Rishabh Kumar

learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Lavlesh Shukla alongwith

Sri Shashi Prakash Rai learned counsel for the University and

the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

Challenge has been raised to the Office Order dated 14.8.2022

issued by the respondent University declaring the result of

successful candidates who have been appointed Assistant

Professor in the subjects English, Commerce, Social Work and

Home Science.

In short, petitioner had applied for appointment on the post of

Assistant Professor English under general category. It is her

case, she had submitted all valid documents and appeared in the

objective test conducted by the University on 16.6.2022.

Though the result of the objective test was declared on the same

day, however the University failed to upload the question paper

together with the model answer key. For that reason the

petitioner was unable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top