ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
HARISH NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 5
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 156 of 1992
Revisionist :- Harish Narain
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Revisionist :- Faujdar Rai,Chandra Kumar
Rai,Purnendu Prakash Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.K. Rai,Chandrakesh
Rai,Sankata Rai,Sankatta Rai,Satish Mandhyan
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard Sri Purnendu Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for
the revisionist and Sri M.D. Singh Shekhar, Senior
Counsel assisted by Sri Vaibhav Goswami, learned counsel
for the respondents.
2. The revisionist by means of present revision has
assailed the order dated 06.02.1992 passed by the District
Judge, Ballia by which an application under Section 47
CPC of the revisionist who was decree-holder has been
rejected by the court below.
3. The facts in brief are that against the land acquisition
award with respect to certain lands, landlords being
dissatisfied with quantification of award of Special Land
Officer have preferred reference which was allowed by the
reference court. The decree-holder i.e. revisionist assigned
the decree to the respondent no.2 for an amount of Rs.8
lacs and by assignment gave right to the respondent no.2
to get the dec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.