Court No. - 9

Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 125 of 2020

Applicant :- Smt. Ranjana Pandey

Opposite Party :- Avanish Pandey

Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

Vide order of this Court dated 02.03.2020, notice was

issued to opposite party. As per o昀케ce report dated

24.11.2021, undelivered cover has been received back

with post o昀케ce remark as "PRAPTKRTA KE GHAR VALON NE

BATAYA KI PRAPTKARTA HAMARE SATH NAHI RAHTA. DELHI

RAHTA HAI." Under such facts of the case, notice is treated

to be su昀케cient and the Court has proceeded to decide the

case on merits.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant

is wife of opposite party and residing at Ballia. He further

submitted that opposite party has 昀椀led Divorce Petition No.

281 of 2018 (Avanish Pandey Vs. Ranjana Pandey), under

Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Principal

Judge, Family Court, Jhansi, which is around 685 kilometers

away from District Ballia, therefore, it is very di昀케cult for

the applicant to attend the Court proceedings at District

Jhansi on each date 昀椀xed and defend e昀昀ectively. He furth