2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 18469
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SAURABH GARG AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SMT. PRIYANKA – Respondent
FAPL 557/2022
Court No. - 39
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 557 of 2022
Appellant :- Saurabh Garg And 3 Others
Respondent :- Smt. Priyanka
Counsel for Appellant :- Himanshu Srivastava,Siddhartha
Srivastava
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
The present appeal is directed against the order passed on an
application 8C-2 filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act
whereby the appellant herein sought for recall of the judgment
and order dated 03.01.2019 passed under Section 27 of Hindu
Marriage Act.
It may be noted that the respondent wife had filed a divorce suit
under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, which was decreed
exparte on 25.05.2018. Thereafter, two proceedings were
initiated by the respondent wife under Sections 25 and 27 of
Hindu Marriage Act, which were registered separately as Case
Nos. 192 of 2015 and 193 of 2015; respectively. Both the cases
were decided exparte on 03.01.2019 by a common order.
It is admitted fact of the matter that the appellant herein did not
seek recall of the divorce decree and the recall had been filed
only with respect to the orders passed under Section 25 and 27
of Hindu Marriage Act. In the explanation offered by the
appellant before the Family Court seeking condonation of
delay, it was stated that the appellant came to know about the
order dated 03.01.2019 only on 25.09.2019 when he had
appeared in the execution proceeding, namely Case No. 31 of
2019. The said explanation offered by the appellant was found
false by the Family Court recording a categorical finding that in
the proceeding under Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act,
namely Misc. Case No. 219 of 2016, on the bail application
moved by the appellant herein, the competent Court while
granting bail on 16.01.2019 had taken note of the fact of
passing of the exparte order dated 03.01.2019, in the proceeding
under Sections 25 and 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, as the said
fact was brought to the notice of the Court in the objection filed
by the respondent wife. The result is that the appellant herein
came to know about the exparte order dated 03.01.2019 on
16.01.2019 itself, as the copy of the objection was received by
him and the factum of passing of the exparte decree was noted
by the competent Court while granting bail to the appellant
herein. No explanation could be offered by the appellant in not
seeking recall of the order dated 03.01.2019 even after having
been released on bail in the criminal case pursuant to the order
dated 16.01.2019.
As the appellant had not come with the clean hands before the
Family Court, we do not find any error in the order passed by
the Family Court, in rejection of the delay condonation
application filed in support of the recall application.
The appeal is dismissed being devoid of merit at the admission
stage itself.
Order Date :- 1.8.2022
gp
Digitally signed by GANESH
PRAKASH
Date: 2022.08.05 13:44:09 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad