SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(All) 21856

PRASHANT SINGH AND 5 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH', '', 'MANOJ KUMAR SINGH', 'G A', '', 'MOHD SHAMIM']

Court No. - 93

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8080 of 2021

Applicant :- Prashant Singh And 5 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Singh,Manoj Kumar

Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Shamim

Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for

the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and

perused the material on record.

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the summoning

order dated 07.06.2018 as well as entire proceedings of Case

No. 903 of 2018 (State Vs. Prashant Singh and others) arising

out of Case Crime No. 104 of 2017, under Sections 498-A, 323,

504, 506, 406 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, PS Mahila, District

Gorakhpur, pending in the court of ACJM, Court No.2,

Gorakhpur.

The opposite party no.2 lodged an FIR Case Crime No. 104 of

2017, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 406 I.P.C. and 3/4

D.P. Act, PS Mahila, District Gorakhpur against the applicants.

After submission of charge-sheet, learned Magistrate has taken

cognizance.

It is submitted that during the course of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top