Advocates:
['VEER BHAGAT SINGH KUSHWAHA', 'C S C', '', 'SANDEEP MANIJI BAKHSHI', 'PRANJAL MEHROTRA']

Court No. - 52

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3068 of 2022

Petitioner :- Raj Kumar And 6 Others

Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. And 7 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Veer Bhagat Singh Kushwaha

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra,Sandeep

Maniji Bakhshi

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

Heard Mr. Veer Bhagat Singh Kushwaha, Counsel for the

petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and

2, Mr. Sandeep Maniji Bakhshi Counsel for respondent Nos.3

and 5 and Mr. Pranjal Mehrotra, Counsel for respondent No.4.

Notice to respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8 is dispensed with as they

are stated to be proforma respondents.

With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being heard

and disposed of finally.

Brief facts of the case are that plot No.6400/1 area 3.428

hectare was recorded in the name of the tenure holders as

mentioned in the Khatauni. Respondent Nos.3 and 5 purchased

0.021 hectare and respondent No.5 purchased 0.021 hectare

area of plot in question by giving wrong boundary vide sale

deed dated 24.06.2019 and initiated proceeding for demarcation

under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, petitioners

filed objections in the aforementio