SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VINAY GARG AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['DHIRAJ SRIVASTAVA', 'G A', '', 'SIYA RAM VERMA', 'PRITI VERMA']

Court No. - 47

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9629 of

2021

Petitioner :- Vinay Garg And 2 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiraj Srivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Priti Verma,Siya Ram Verma

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

Heard Shri Dhiraj Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners

and learned A.G.A for the State-respondents.

Present matter was taken up on 23.10.2021 and on the said date,

following interim order was accorded in favour of the

petitioners:-

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A.

The petitioners, by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash

the impugned First Information Report dated 01.10.2021 registered as Case

Crime No.0036 of 2021 (State v. Vinay Garg & Ors.) under Section 498A, 313

IPC & 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Badshahi Naka, Distt. Kanpur Nagar and for a direction

to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First

Information Report.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top