SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
SIKANDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 45

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4576 of 2021

Petitioner :- Sikandar

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Akram

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J.

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

Shri Mohammad Akram, for the petitioner and Shri J.K.

Upadhyay for the State through video conferencing.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the

impugned notice dated 5.10.2020 issued by respondent no.2

under section 3(1) of U.P. Control of Goondas Act.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to Covid-19

pandemic, he could not file reply to the said show cause notice

and purpose of filing this petition would be served if he is

permitted to file reply to the said notice within two weeks and

in turn respondent no.2 be directed to decide the same by a

speaking order.

State counsel has no objection to this proposition.

The petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file reply

to the said notice within two weeks from today and in the

eventuality of doing so, it is expected from respondent no.2 to

decide the same on merits in accordance with law as

expeditiously

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top