ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAY BHANOT,SANJAY YADAV
PRAAKIRTIK SAMPADA SANRAKSHAN SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
WPIL/461/2019
Court No. - 9
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 461 of 2019
Petitioner :- Praakirtik Sampada Sanrakshan Samiti
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P.Singh,Sachida Nand Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akhilanand Mishra,Akhilesh Kumar
Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,J.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Petitioner, a society registered under Society Registration Act
vide this Public Interest Litigation seeks direction to respondent
No. 2 to 4 to immediately start the proceedings under the
provision of Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Holdings
Act, 1960 in respect of land bearing Khata No. 359
admeasuring 13.340 hectare situated at Village Awadhpur,
Tappa Kevtali, Pargana Haveily, Tehsil Chauri Chaura, District
Gorakhpur by declaring it surplus and distribute the same
amongst the poor and downtrodden in the society and declare
the sale deeds dated 18.05.2018 by respondent No. 6 and 7 in
favour of respondent no. 8 as null and void.
Though many a contention has been made in the petition;
however, principal contention of the petitioner is that the land in
question was inherited by Shanti Devi, mother of respondent
No. 6, from her father Babu Bindeshwari Bakhs Singh, and
though there exist the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land
Reforms Act, 1950 and the Act of 1960, yet the land in question
inherited by Shanti Devi was not subjected to ceiling
proceedings resulting in its escapement from being declared
surplus. Because of said escapement, it is urged that, the
successors of said Shanti Devi, i.e., respondent No. 6 and 7
have disposed of the property vide impugned sale deed. It is
urged that retention of land in question being contrary to the
provision of the Act of 1950 and 1960 renders the execution of
sale deed void ab initio.
To substantiate the contention further, the petitioner has filed an
amendment application seeking incorporation of certain facts
wherefrom it is borne out that the entire agriculture holding of
Smt. Shanti Devi was subjected to proceedings under the Act of
1960 whereon an order was passed on 2.9.1989 by Prescribed
Authority whereby 75.05 acre of her holding was declared
surplus; whereagainst she preferred an appeal before the
Additional Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur
forming subject matter of Case No. 145/257/6/G/1989. The
appeal was decided on 13.3.1991 whereby the order passed by
Prescribed Authority was modified and in place of 75.05 acres,
38.75 acres of land was found surplus. It is further borne out
from the record that the appellate order was unsuccessfully
challenged in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21024 of 1991
(dismissed on 23.04.1998) and Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.
11954 of 1991 (Dismissed on 27.3.2009).
The facts in record belie the contention of the petitioner that
13.340 hectare of Khata No. 359 Village Awadhpur was
illegally retained by Smt. Shanti Devi and her legal heirs.
Furthermore, the petitioner miserably fails to establish that the
subject land was declared surplus.
That being so, the petition being sans merit deserves to be and
is hereby dismissed. No Costs.
All interlocutory applications stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.3.2021
Kirti
(Ajay Bhanot, J) (Sanjay Yadav, J)