ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Priyanshu Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21904
of 2021
Applicant :- Priyanshu Chaudhary
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Raj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for
the State through vedio conferencing.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is labour and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case. It is next submitted that applicant alongwith two
other co-accused Sonu Yadav and Lucki Paswan were shown to
be arrested alongwith recovery of Tullu pump. It is further
submitted that co-accused Lucki Paswan has been enlarged on
bail by this Court vide order dated 11.6.2021 in Criminal Misc.
Bail Application No. 21741 of 2021. Prior to this case,
applicant is having no criminal history. He is languishing in jail
since 11.4.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not
misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not
dispute the aforesaid facts.
Considering the material on record as well as the dictum of
Apex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.