Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9523 of 2021

Petitioner :- Purushottam

Respondent :- Small Cause Court Meerut And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta

Counsel for Respondent :- Vinayak Mithal

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sagar

Mehrotra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vinayak Mithal,

Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

This writ petition has been filed praying for quashing the order

dated 10.03.2021 passed by the Prescribed Authority in P.A.

Case No. 24 of 2017, whereby the application of the petitioner,

who is defendant in the suit, to issue Amin Commission on his

expenses to get clear report of situation of shop in dispute

was rejected.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Court below

has wrongly rejected his application praying for calling of Amin

Commission report. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2

and 3 has opposed the argument and has submitted that

the proceedings are pending under Section 21(1)(b) of U.p. Act

No. 13 of 1972 before the Prescribed Authority since the year

2017. Only to further delay the disposal of the case, this

applicat