ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
BABLU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/41427/2020
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41427 of 2020
Applicant :- Bablu Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Puneet Srivastava,Rajesh Kumar
Srivastava,Vishnu Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional
Government Advocate representing the State and perused the
record of the case.
By means of this application, the applicant, Bablu Singh, who is
involved in Case Crime No. 116 of 2020, under Section 3/7
Essential Commodities Act, Police Station-Iglas, District-
Aligarh, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
As per the prosecution case on 19.03.2020, supply Inspector
lodged F.I.R. with regard to occurrence dated 18.03.2020
against the applicant Bablu Singh, Jagdish, Pawan, Rohtas,
Nobil and one unknown person alleging inter alia that on
receiving the secret information from the informer and pursuant
to direction of District Magistrate, raid was conducted at the
premises of the applicant, where co-accused Jagdish was found
present whereas other accused persons succeeded in fleeing
away from the place of occurrence. At that time one tanker No.
UP81 CT 7477 of Tarkol and one Tata Max vehicle without
number were standing there, in which several drums of spirit
were kept. It is the case of the prosecution that on taking search
of the premises of the applicant twelve drums containing 2300
liters diesel, nine drums containing 1700 liters petrol, one drum
containing 200 liters mixed spirit/petroleum substance and two
drums containing 300 liters kerosene oil were recovered.
Samples were drawn at the spot from the aforesaid recovered
petroleum substance. On asking about the documents regarding
aforesaid recovered petroleum substance, co-accused Jagdish
could not show any document. As such, there is violation of the
provisions of U.P. Kerosene Control Order, 1962; U.P. High
Speed Diesel Oil and Light Diesel Oil (Storage and
Distribution) Order, 1981 and Motor Spirit and High Speed
Diesel (Regulation of Supply, Distribution and Prevention of
Malpractices) Order, 2005, which is punishable under Section
3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant has been falsely implicated in this case for ulterior
purposes. There is no independent public witness of aforesaid
recovery. The applicant was not present at the spot. The
applicant is Gram Pradhan and also a contractor. He has four
Extroverts of JCB company, Four Dumper Trucks and five
Tankers, registration certificate of said vehicles have been
brought on record as Annexure No. 6 to the bail application. It
is submitted that some other vehicles also run under the
applicant. It is next submitted that according to Petroleum Act,
petroleum substance has been divided into three classes, namely
Class-A Petrol, Class-B diesel and Class-C Kerosene Oil.
It is next submitted that the alleged recovery of 1700 liters
petrol is not petrol but in fact the same is a solvent which is
used in washing clothes and also used in paint and for keeping
the same no license is needed. So far as petrol is concerned, it is
submitted that there is no need to have license upto six gallons
petrol. So far as Class-B Diesel is concerned, there is no need to
have license upto 2500 liters diesel and regarding Class-C
kerosene oil is concerned, there is no need to have license upto
45 liters. On the strength of aforesaid submission it is submitted
that according to Section 17(3) of U.P. High Speed Diesel Oil
and Light Speed Diesel Oil order, 1981, any person can keep
200 liters for every vehicle and the same shall not include the
diesel in the tank of the vehicle. It is further submitted that the
applicant has been involved in thirteen other criminal cases, out
of which in three cases the applicant has been acquitted, in four
cases fi