SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH BABU TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 49

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8387 of 2021

Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Babu Tripathi

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Gulab Chandra,Rupesh Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.

1. Heard Sri Gulab Chandra, learned counsel for applicant and

learned AGA for the State.

2. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed

seeking quashing of the cognizance order dated 28.01.2021,

passed by J.M.F.C. in the matter of a complaint under Section

138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act registered as Complaint

Case No. 3686 of 2019, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.,

Shikohabad, District-Firozabad, on the ground that there is no

proof of service of notice on the present applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed reliance on the

judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application

U/S 482 No. 12854 of 2013 (Smt. Veena Singhal vs. State of

U.P. and Another), so also on the judgment of Karnataka High

Court in case of A.P. Amit Kumar vs. A.P. Manjunath, passed

in Criminal Appeal No. 418 of 2010 on 19.03.2018 to support

his claim that if there is a dispute in regard t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top