Court No. - 9

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11050 of 2021

Petitioner :- Gauri Shankar

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,Acting Chief Justice

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

The matter is taken up through video conferencing.

Sri Saurabh Yadav, learned counsel appears on behalf of

petitioner.

Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondents.

Petitioner seeks indulgence in respect of action taken by the

Respondent-Financial Institution under the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Securities Interest Act, 2002.

In our considered opinion and has been held by the Supreme

Court in the case of United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tandon

and Others, (2010) 8 SCC 110 wherein in paragraph 42 and 43

it is held:

"42. There is another reason why the impugned order should be set aside.

If respondent No.1 had any tangible grievance against the notice issued

under Section 13(4) or action taken under Section 14, then she could have

availed remedy by filing an application under Section 17(1). The

expression `any person' used in Section 17(1) is of wide