DHARM SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
A482 3715/2021
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3715 of
2021
Applicant :- Dharm Singh And Another
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Shubham
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on
record.
Heard counsel for the applicants, learned AGA
and perused the record.
Counsel for the applicant argues that from a plain
reading of the FIR as well as evidences referred
to in the chargehseet, no case can be said to be
made out under Section 3 (1) r and under Section
3 (2) (va) of the SC/ST Act. He places reliance
on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case
of Hitesh Verma Vs. State of Uttrakhand and
another, AIR 2020 SC 5584 as well as Khuman
Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2019
SC 4030.
I have perused the FIR as well as statements filed
today along with supplementary affidavit.
There is no averment to the effect that any caste
related words were uttered against the informant
or there was any utterance of specific caste
names in public view. On the contrary,
submissions are that the incident took place at the
home of informant. Further more, there is
nothing on record even to suggest that such
incident occurred or caused by applicant knowing
that the Opposite Party No. 2 was of a particular
caste and therefore, the said incident had taken
place.
In view of the above and also in the light of the
judgments passed in the case of Hitesh Verma
(supra) as well as Khuman Singh (supra), the
summoning order of the applicants under
Sections 3 (1) r and 3 (2) (va) is set aside. The
applicants shall now face trial for the offences
under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 of the IPC
only.
The application is disposed off relying on the
same and in terms recorded above.
The submission of the counsel for the applicants
with regard to other offences under Sections 323,
504, 506 and 427 of the IPC, no case is made out
for quashing. His request for appearance for
discharge, which is specific, is rejected.
Order Date :- 25.3.2021
vinay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.