SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK VARMA
MAMMON CONCAST PRIVATE LIMITED AND 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 79

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2520 of 2021

Applicant :- Mammon Concast Private Limited And 4 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Mahesh Chandra Tiwari,Kiran Tiwari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the

proceeding of complaint Case No. 35 of 2019, Registrar of Companies Vs.

Mammon Concast Private Limited and others, under Section 134(5) of the

Companies Act, 1956, Police Station Kamla Nagar, District Agra pending

in the court of Special C.J.M., Agra as well as the summoning order dated

20.02.2019.

Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the impugned

summoning order dated 20.02.2019 is a sketchy and cryptic order. He

further submits that the court below while summoning the applicants has

materially erred and did not follow the dictum of law as propounded by

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in various cases that summoning in criminal

case is a serious matter and the court below without dwelling into material

and visualizing the case on the touchst

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top