ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NILANSH – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY IN CHARGE / AMIN - AUCTIONER AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 29
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 149 of 2021
Appellant :- Nilansh
Respondent :- The Secretary In Charge / Amin - Auctioner And 4 Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Mayank Kumar Agrawal
Counsel for Respondent :- Archit Mandhyan
Hon'ble Munishwar Nath Bhandari,Acting Chief Justice
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Mayank Kumar Agrawal for the petitioner -
appellant and Shri Adarsh Bhushan for the respondents.
By this appeal, a challenge is made to the judgement dated
16.03.2021; whereby, the writ petition, preferred by the
petitioner, was disposed of without causing interference in the
order of suspension, so as the charge sheet.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suspension
order, so as the charge sheet, were not by the competent
authority as per Rule 7 of the Uttar Pradesh Government
Servant (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred
to as, 'the Rules of 1999'). The petitioner - appellant was
appointed as Class - IV servant and for him, the competent
authority was the Secretary of Mandi Samiti. The order of
suspension, so as the charge sheet, has been issued by the
officiating Secretary. According to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.