Advocates:
['KULDEEP KUMAR', 'C S C', '', 'ANADI KRISHNA NARAYANA']

Court No. - 9

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9751 of 2021

Petitioner :- M/S Sine Cloth Emporium

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Kuldeep Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anadi Krishna Narayana

Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,Acting Chief Justice

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

The matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.

Sri Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel appears on behalf of

petitioner.

Sri Anadi Krishna Narayan, learned counsel appears on

behalf of respondent no.4.

The grievance raised by the petitioner is against the initiation

of proceeding under Section 13 of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities

Interest Act, 2002.

In the case of United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tandon and

Others, (2010) 8 SCC 110 wherein in paragraph 42 and 43 it is

held:

"42. There is another reason why the impugned order

should be set aside. If respondent No.1 had any tangible

grievance against the notice issued under Section 13(4) or

action taken under Section 14, then she could have availed

remedy by filing an application under Section 17(1). The

expression `any person' used in Section 17(1) is of wide

import. It take