SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJARAM YADAV AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 5

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 277 of 2021

Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Singh

Respondent :- Rajaram Yadav And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mustaqeem Ahmad,Anita Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- Archit Mandhyan,Rishabh Kumar

Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Archit

Mandhyan, learned counsel for the respondents.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging

the order dated 23.12.2020 passed by Additional District

Judge/F.T.C. 3rd, District Ballia in Rent Control Appeal No. 1

of 2017 by which the appellate court has rejected the

amendment application filed by the petitioner for incorporating

certain amendment in the written statement.

The respondents have filed an application under Section 21 (1)

(a) of the Act No. 13 of 1972 for release of shop detailed in the

release application on the ground that the shop is needed for the

establishment of business of son of the landlord. The release

application was contested by the petitioner and the prescribed

authority by judgement and order dated 6.5.2017 passed in P.A.

Case No. 141 of 2013 allowed the release application, which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top