SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHAHID NABI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['S M IQBAL HASAN', 'C S C', '', 'SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDEY', 'ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA']

1

Reserved on – 26.8.2021

Delivered on – 9.9.2021

Court No. - 19

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 54809 of 2017

Petitioner :- Shahid Nabi

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- S.M. Iqbal Hasan

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar

Srivastava,Subhash Chandra Pandey

Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

1.

The facts in brief of the present writ petition are that the

petitioner was running a fair price shop under an agreement

executed in terms of Government Order 2004. Certain complaints

were made against the petitioner of committing irregularities. The

Sub Divisional Officer, Rampur conducted an inquiry and

suspended the agreement of petitioner's fair price shop by an order

dated 9.5.2017 and sought reply of the petitioner on the

allegations. The petitioner filed a reply to the allegations along

with certain affidavits in support of his case that false complaints

were made against him and no irregularities were committed by

petitioner. The S.D.M. concerned, after considering the material

on record, by an order dated 25.7.2017, cancelled the agreement

of petitioner regarding fair price shop on the ground of supply of

less then prescribe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top