SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PRAKASH PADIA
RAM AWADH – Appellant
Versus
CIVIL JUDGE JUNIOR DIVISION AND 12 OTHERS – Respondent
A227/2270/2021



Court No. - 9

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2270 of 2021

Petitioner :- Ram Awadh

Respondent :- Civil Judge Junior Division And 12 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Devbratt Yadav,Ram Pratap Yadav

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be

issued to respondents.

The petitioners have preferred the present petition under Article

227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a

direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sahar Azamgarh

to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 C.P.C

filed in Original Suit No.295 of 2021 (Ram Awadh Vs. Nanda

and others).

It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from

the aforesaid suit, an stay application has also preferred by him

for grant of interim protection. It is argued that the interim

protection is urgently required and prays for early disposal of

the stay application.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering

into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the Court

below to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid application

filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably on the next

date fixed. In case, on the said date on account of any reason,

the said application could not decide on the said, the court

below will decide the same expeditiously and preferably within

a period of two months thereafter.

Order Date :- 24.6.2021

saqlain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top