ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJEEV MISRA
HARENDER SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4768 of 2021
Applicant :- Harender Sharma
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rana
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar
Upadhyay,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Mr. Amit Rana, learned counsel for applicant, learned
A.G.A. for State and Mr. Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, learned
counsel representing opposite party-2.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant contends that
due to inadvertance Km. Payal, who was applicant no.2 in
proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has not been impleaded
as opposite party-3 in present application. He therefore submits
that permission be granted to amend the cause title of present
application by seeking impleadment of Km. Payal as opposite
party no.3 in present application.
3. Prayer made for is bonafide. Accordingly same is allowed.
4. Let, necessary amendment in cause title of present
application be carried by learned counsel for applicant during
course of the day.
5. This Application under Section 482 has been filed
challenging order dated 21.11.2020 passed by Additional
Principal Judge, Family Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.