SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJIV GUPTA
PARWATI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 80

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1941 of 2021

Petitioner :- Parwati Devi

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.

and perused the record.

Present matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India

has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash

the impugned order dated 04.09.2019 passed by Session

Judge, Ballia in Criminal Revision No. 141 of 2019 as well

as order dated 06.07.2019 passed by A.C.J.M-I, Ballia

under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. P.S. Phephana, District Ballia.

Brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by

the petitioner on 06.07.2019 under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

before the A.C.J.M, Ballia and the learned magistrate after

considering the entire allegations and material on record

directed the application to be treated as a complaint for

recording the statement of the complainant under section

200 Cr.P.C.

Being aggrieved by the said order dated 06.07.2019,

criminal revision was preferred by the petitioner being

Criminal Revision No. 141 of 2019

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top