SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Priyanshu Chaudhary@priyanshuYadav – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


Court No. - 69

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21891

of 2021

Applicant :- Priyanshu Chaudhary@Priyanshuyadav

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Raj Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for

the State through vedio conferencing.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that

applicant is labour and he has been falsely implicated in the

present case. It is next submitted that applicant alongwith two

other co-accused Sonu Yadav and Lucki Paswan were shown to

be arrested alongwith recovery of three Tullu pumps, two

mobiles and three country made pistol. It is further submitted

that in the matter of Arms Act, separate FIRs have been lodged.

It is lastly submitted that co-accused Lucki Paswan in the

matter of Arms Act, has been enlarged on bail by this Court

vide order dated 23.6.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application

No. 21887 of 2021. Prior to this case, applicant is having no

criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 11.4.2021 and in

case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top