ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Priyanshu Chaudhary@priyanshuYadav – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21891
of 2021
Applicant :- Priyanshu Chaudhary@Priyanshuyadav
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Raj Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for
the State through vedio conferencing.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is labour and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case. It is next submitted that applicant alongwith two
other co-accused Sonu Yadav and Lucki Paswan were shown to
be arrested alongwith recovery of three Tullu pumps, two
mobiles and three country made pistol. It is further submitted
that in the matter of Arms Act, separate FIRs have been lodged.
It is lastly submitted that co-accused Lucki Paswan in the
matter of Arms Act, has been enlarged on bail by this Court
vide order dated 23.6.2021 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application
No. 21887 of 2021. Prior to this case, applicant is having no
criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 11.4.2021 and in
case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.