SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DEEPU NISHAD – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2621 of 2021

Appellant :- Deepu Nishad

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Appellant :- Abhinav Gaur,Ajay Singh,Ankit Shukla,Mohd.

Rashid Siddiqui

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ajay Singh,Dewarshi Kumar Rai

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ankit Shukla,

learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ajay Singh and Sri Dewarshi Kumar Rai,

learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A.

Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the informant today in the Court is

taken on record. Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to file any

rejoinder affidavit and wants to argue the case on merit. Under the

circumstances, the Court is deciding the present appeal on merits.

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled

Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short "S.C./S.T. Act") has been

filed for setting-aside the impugned order dated 15.06.2021 passed by In-charge

Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Kanpur Nagar in Bail Application No.1920 of 2021,

arising out of Case Crime no.39 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top