SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

YOGENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P AND 14 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANOJ YADAV', 'C S C', '', 'RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHUKLA']

Court No. - 6

Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1945 of 2021

Petitioner :- Yogendra Yadav

Respondent :- State Of U P And 14 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla

Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.

Heard Sri Manoj Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rameshwar

Prasad Shukla who appears for respondent no. 5 and Sri J.P. Singh, learned

Standing Counsel , who appears for respondent nos. 1 to 4.

In view of the order proposed to be passed there is no need to issue notice to

respondent nos. 6 to 15.

By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has sought the following

reliefs:-

a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding

directing the respondent authority/Tehsildar, Tehsil Belthara Road, District

Ballia/respondent no 4 to remove the illegal encroachment made by the

respondent nos. 6 to 15 over the Arazi No. 349M area 0.1250 hectare and Arazi

No. 368 area 0.1090 hectare which is recorded as Chakroad in revenue record

situated at Village Shahpur Afga, Post Telma, Pargana Sikandarpur Garvi,

Tehsil-Belthara Road, District Ballia.

b. Issue a writ,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top