SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJIV GUPTA
SONU @ SONAM – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 80

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3354 of 2021

Petitioner :- Sonu @ Sonam

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Prasad

Sharma

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.

and perused the record.

Present matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India

has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash

the impugned order dated 11.2.2021 passed by Session

Judge, Maharajganj in Criminal Revision No. 91 of 2020 as

well as

order dated 4.11.2020 passed by C.J.M,

Maharajganj in Misc. case no. 4433 of 2020 under section

156(3) Cr.P.C. P.S. Paniyara, District Maharajganj.

Brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by

the petitioner on 16.7.2020 under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

before the C.J.M, Maharajganj and the learned magistrate

after considering the entire allegations and material on

record directed the application to be treated as a

complaint for recording the statement of the complainant

under section 200 Cr.P.C.

Being aggrieved by the said order dated 4.11.2020,

criminal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top