ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAJIV GUPTA
SONU @ SONAM – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 80
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3354 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sonu @ Sonam
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Prasad
Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.
and perused the record.
Present matters under Article 227 of Constitution of India
has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash
the impugned order dated 11.2.2021 passed by Session
Judge, Maharajganj in Criminal Revision No. 91 of 2020 as
well as
order dated 4.11.2020 passed by C.J.M,
Maharajganj in Misc. case no. 4433 of 2020 under section
156(3) Cr.P.C. P.S. Paniyara, District Maharajganj.
Brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by
the petitioner on 16.7.2020 under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
before the C.J.M, Maharajganj and the learned magistrate
after considering the entire allegations and material on
record directed the application to be treated as a
complaint for recording the statement of the complainant
under section 200 Cr.P.C.
Being aggrieved by the said order dated 4.11.2020,
criminal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.