SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJAY BHANOT
DAMYANTI – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23931 of 2021

Petitioner :- Damyanti

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Pathak,Manisha Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

Heard Sri Sanjay Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Standing Counsel for the State

respondents.

The writ petition arises out of proceedings taken out under

Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 by the

petitioner which came to be registered as R.S.T./02438 of

2018, Computer Case No.T201805200102438 (Damyanti

Vs Ramswaroop) before the learned court below.

Sri Sanjay Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the sole defendant in the proceedings before

the court below has been duly served notice and has also

entered appearance before the court below. The objection

filed by the sole defendant/respondent no. 3 is also in the

record of this writ petition.

Attention is called to the orders dated 25.11.2014 and

24.12.2014 in the order sheet of the learned court below. It

is contended that there is no reasonable cause for delay in

deciding the aforesaid proceedings. The learned court

below has not adh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top