1

Court No. - 40

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6432 of 2017

Petitioner :- Central Bank Of India And Another

Respondent :- D.M. Farrukhaba As they d And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyan Prakash Shrivastava

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.

Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.

1.

The order-sheet reflects that notice was issued to

the respondents 2, 3, 4 and 5 through Registered Post A/D but

neither acknowledgment nor undelivered cover was received

back. As the notice was issued to the respondents 2 to 5 way

back in the year 2018 and neither acknowledgment nor

undelivered cover has been received back, the service of notice

on the respondents 2 to 5 is held sufficient. As they have

neither filed counter affidavit nor have engaged a counsel, we

deem it appropriate to proceed ex parte against them.

2.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners;

learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1; and have

perused the record.

3.

The prayer in this petition is to quash the order,

dated 11th July, 2016, of the District Magistrate, Farrukhabad

(respondent no.1) in Case No.87 of 2015, under Section 14 of

the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and